MCP.

This abbreviation resonates with females, associated with males, endorsed by the male sexists, condemned by the feminists.

Male Chauvinist Pig
- a term used in the 1960s among feminists for men, usually with some power, who believed that men were superior and expressed that opinion freely in word and action.

- a man who is perceived as approving of an inferior status for women in society: a disparaging term.


Firstly, I need to reinstate that I DO NOT advocate Male chauvinism. In the event that I ever acted like one, it's only because the woman behaves like a feminist. What I am trying to explain here, is about having a balanced demeanor, towards each other. Ladies...You wanna be treated with equality and respect, yet expect him to stand up for you, lean on his shoulder, flush clogged pipes and change bulbs? Be a *smart woman. Being 'soft' isn't being weak. Men have huge egos that vapourise at the lightest of a woman's coos. Why try to be the man in the relationship? Men definitely dun wanna feel like they are humping another man...

*smart doesn't mean earning lots, behaving like a smart ass and making yr man looks hen-pecked.

I say, let the man be a man.

I believed Men generally appreciate and embrace the evolution of the modern woman. I dun mind my other half earning more than I do, I definitely dun mind doing household chores. I love my woman to be of equal standing, has a mind of her own, engage me in ocassional intellectual banterings, and holds herself well in the company of family and frens. She will always be my queen. Not king, but queen. We can't have 2 kings, can we?

I know there are some jackasses out there who think the world of their own masculinities. They view women as objects of desire, sex slaves, part-time maids to worse terms that I shall not mention. But dun let a few black sheeps stereotyped the whole flock. There are some males out there who love and treat their mates with respect. Likewise, there are also women who like bullying their men into submission. They want to dictate everything, makes their men do their biddings, control how much they spend, where they go, who to hang out with...heck! Some even blackmailed them with the lure of sex!! Why can't we work in unison and perform our primary roles instead? You and me are man and woman first, then other secondary duties. Be it whoever is a big shot, small shot, hot shot in your respective capacities, you dun bring that identities back to each other. We are a couple and we will take each other for what we are. You dun wan a Mike Tyson in your relationship, I dun need a 武则天 in mine too.

For whatever misgivings some of my buddies had affirmly and wrongly accused me of, I am NOT an MCP and I do want a real, out and out, confident feminine form to be in love with any day. I might be loud, short-fused and opinionated, but I am not ridiculous or a double-standards bearer! We will adhere to the same set of rules and love each other on a level-playing field.

Juz dun try to wear my pants, ok?


It seems to me that a mutually beneficial relationship between a man and woman requires the man to be dominant. A sensible woman will allow the man to think he is.'

~Beryl Bainbridge'